Typing Errors in Factual Knowledge Graphs: Severity and Possible Ways Out
원문 초록
Factual knowledge graphs (KGs) such as DBpedia and Wikidata have served as part of various downstream tasks and are also widely adopted by artificial intelligence research communities as benchmark datasets. However, we found these KGs to be surprisingly noisy. In this study, we question the quality of these KGs, where the typing error rate is estimated to be 27% for coarse-grained types on average, and even 73% for certain fine-grained types. In pursuit of solutions, we propose an active typing error detection algorithm that maximizes the utilization of both gold and noisy labels. We also comprehensively discuss and compare unsupervised, semi-supervised, and supervised paradigms to deal with typing errors in factual KGs. The outcomes of this study provide guidelines for researchers to use noisy factual KGs. To help practitioners deploy the techniques and conduct further research, we published our code and data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Schema Matching
Graph Collaborative Attention Network for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
A Multi-Expert Structural-Semantic Hybrid Framework for Unveiling Historical Patterns in Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Learning Efficient and Generalizable Graph Retriever for Knowledge-Graph Question Answering
Bridging RDF Knowledge Graphs with Graph Neural Networks for Semantically-Rich Recommender Systems
Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.