Comparing Classification Models on Kepler Data
원문 초록
Even though the original Kepler mission ended due to mechanical failures, the Kepler satellite continues to collect data. Using classification models, we can understand the features exoplanets possess and then use those features to investigate further for any more information on the candidate planet. Based on the classification model, the idea is to find out the probability of the planet under observation being a candidate for an exoplanet or a false positive. If the model predicts that the observation is a candidate for being an exoplanet, then the further investigation can be conducted. From the model, we can narrow down the features that might explain the difference between a candidate and a false-positive which ultimately helps us to increase the efficiency of any model and fine-tune the model and ultimately the process of searching for any future exoplanets. The model comparison is supported by McNemar's test for checking significance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Generative Adversarial Minority Oversampling for Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification
Attention-Based Adaptive Spectral-Spatial Kernel ResNet for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Image and Text fusion for UPMC Food-101 \\using BERT and CNNs
Kidney Level Lupus Nephritis Classification using Uncertainty Guided Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks
Beyond the Attention: Distinguish the Discriminative and Confusable Features For Fine-grained Image Classification
Orthrus: A Bimodal Learning Architecture for Malware Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.