Modeling and Optimization Trade-off in Meta-learning
원문 초록
By searching for shared inductive biases across tasks, meta-learning promises to accelerate learning on novel tasks, but with the cost of solving a complex bilevel optimization problem. We introduce and rigorously define the trade-off between accurate modeling and optimization ease in meta-learning. At one end, classic meta-learning algorithms account for the structure of meta-learning but solve a complex optimization problem, while at the other end domain randomized search (otherwise known as joint training) ignores the structure of meta-learning and solves a single level optimization problem. Taking MAML as the representative meta-learning algorithm, we theoretically characterize the trade-off for general non-convex risk functions as well as linear regression, for which we are able to provide explicit bounds on the errors associated with modeling and optimization. We also empirically study this trade-off for meta-reinforcement learning benchmarks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Fast and Data-Efficient Spectrum Allocation in Dynamic Wireless Networks
Differentially Private Bilevel Optimization: Efficient Algorithms with Near-Optimal Rates
Meta-reinforcement learning with minimum attention
Efficient Curvature-Aware Hypergradient Approximation for Bilevel Optimization
InstructRAG: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Instruction Graphs for LLM-Based Task Planning
On the Convergence of Adam-Type Algorithm for Bilevel Optimization under Unbounded Smoothness
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.