ResNet or DenseNet? Introducing Dense Shortcuts to ResNet
원문 초록
ResNet or DenseNet? Nowadays, most deep learning based approaches are implemented with seminal backbone networks, among them the two arguably most famous ones are ResNet and DenseNet. Despite their competitive performance and overwhelming popularity, inherent drawbacks exist for both of them. For ResNet, the identity shortcut that stabilizes training also limits its representation capacity, while DenseNet has a higher capacity with multi-layer feature concatenation. However, the dense concatenation causes a new problem of requiring high GPU memory and more training time. Partially due to this, it is not a trivial choice between ResNet and DenseNet. This paper provides a unified perspective of dense summation to analyze them, which facilitates a better understanding of their core difference. We further propose dense weighted normalized shortcuts as a solution to the dilemma between them. Our proposed dense shortcut inherits the design philosophy of simple design in ResNet and DenseNet. On several benchmark datasets, the experimental results show that the proposed DSNet achieves significantly better results than ResNet, and achieves comparable performance as DenseNet but requiring fewer computation resources.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DeepCEE: Efficient Cross-Region Model Distributed Training System under Heterogeneous GPUs and Networks
APE: Selective Fine-tuning with Acceptance Criteria for Language Model Adaptation
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
Arctic Inference with Shift Parallelism: Fast and Efficient Open Source Inference System for Enterprise AI
Relative Entropy Pathwise Policy Optimization
Streaming 4D Visual Geometry Transformer
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.