ALPaCA vs. GP-based Prior Learning: A Comparison between two Bayesian Meta-Learning Algorithms
원문 초록
Meta-learning or few-shot learning, has been successfully applied in a wide range of domains from computer vision to reinforcement learning. Among the many frameworks proposed for meta-learning, bayesian methods are particularly favoured when accurate and calibrated uncertainty estimate is required. In this paper, we investigate the similarities and disparities among two recently published bayesian meta-learning methods: ALPaCA (Harrison et al. [2018]) and PACOH (Rothfuss et al. [2020]). We provide theoretical analysis as well as empirical benchmarks across synthetic and real-world dataset. While ALPaCA holds advantage in computation time by the usage of a linear kernel, general GP-based methods provide much more flexibility and achieves better result across datasets when using a common kernel such as SE (Squared Exponential) kernel. The influence of different loss function choice is also discussed.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Socratic RL: A Novel Framework for Efficient Knowledge Acquisition through Iterative Reflection and Viewpoint Distillation
Few-Shot Learning for Industrial Time Series: A Comparative Analysis Using the Example of Screw-Fastening Process Monitoring
Hyperbolic Dual Feature Augmentation for Open-Environment
Multi-modal Siamese Network for Entity Alignment
A Closer Look at the Training Strategy for Modern Meta-Learning
Fuzzy Graph Neural Network for Few-Shot Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.