F1 is Not Enough! Models and Evaluation Towards User-Centered Explainable Question Answering
원문 초록
Explainable question answering systems predict an answer together with an explanation showing why the answer has been selected. The goal is to enable users to assess the correctness of the system and understand its reasoning process. However, we show that current models and evaluation settings have shortcomings regarding the coupling of answer and explanation which might cause serious issues in user experience. As a remedy, we propose a hierarchical model and a new regularization term to strengthen the answer-explanation coupling as well as two evaluation scores to quantify the coupling. We conduct experiments on the HOTPOTQA benchmark data set and perform a user study. The user study shows that our models increase the ability of the users to judge the correctness of the system and that scores like F1 are not enough to estimate the usefulness of a model in a practical setting with human users. Our scores are better aligned with user experience, making them promising candidates for model selection.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
L0: Reinforcement Learning to Become General Agents
Decoupled Seg Tokens Make Stronger Reasoning Video Segmenter and Grounder
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.