Discourse structure interacts with reference but not syntax in neural language models
원문 초록
Language models (LMs) trained on large quantities of text have been claimed to acquire abstract linguistic representations. Our work tests the robustness of these abstractions by focusing on the ability of LMs to learn interactions between different linguistic representations. In particular, we utilized stimuli from psycholinguistic studies showing that humans can condition reference (i.e. coreference resolution) and syntactic processing on the same discourse structure (implicit causality). We compared both transformer and long short-term memory LMs to find that, contrary to humans, implicit causality only influences LM behavior for reference, not syntax, despite model representations that encode the necessary discourse information. Our results further suggest that LM behavior can contradict not only learned representations of discourse but also syntactic agreement, pointing to shortcomings of standard language modeling.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specification-based Security Evaluation of Real-World Agents Tool-Calling under Long-Horizon Context Tasks
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
InstructFLIP: Exploring Unified Vision-Language Model for Face Anti-spoofing
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.