Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extraction
원문 초록
Neural models have achieved remarkable success on relation extraction (RE) benchmarks. However, there is no clear understanding which type of information affects existing RE models to make decisions and how to further improve the performance of these models. To this end, we empirically study the effect of two main information sources in text: textual context and entity mentions (names). We find that (i) while context is the main source to support the predictions, RE models also heavily rely on the information from entity mentions, most of which is type information, and (ii) existing datasets may leak shallow heuristics via entity mentions and thus contribute to the high performance on RE benchmarks. Based on the analyses, we propose an entity-masked contrastive pre-training framework for RE to gain a deeper understanding on both textual context and type information while avoiding rote memorization of entities or use of superficial cues in mentions. We carry out extensive experiments to support our views, and show that our framework can improve the effectiveness and robustness of neural models in different RE scenarios. All the code and datasets are released at https://github.com/thunlp/RE-Context-or-Names.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Chaining Event Spans for Temporal Relation Grounding
Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification
Towards a More Generalized Approach in Open Relation Extraction
Towards Rehearsal-Free Continual Relation Extraction: Capturing Within-Task Variance with Adaptive Prompting
Bridging Generative and Discriminative Learning: Few-Shot Relation Extraction via Two-Stage Knowledge-Guided Pre-training
Relation Extraction or Pattern Matching? Unravelling the Generalisation Limits of Language Models for Biographical RE
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.