Corpora Evaluation and System Bias Detection in Multi-document Summarization
원문 초록
Multi-document summarization (MDS) is the task of reflecting key points from any set of documents into a concise text paragraph. In the past, it has been used to aggregate news, tweets, product reviews, etc. from various sources. Owing to no standard definition of the task, we encounter a plethora of datasets with varying levels of overlap and conflict between participating documents. There is also no standard regarding what constitutes summary information in MDS. Adding to the challenge is the fact that new systems report results on a set of chosen datasets, which might not correlate with their performance on the other datasets. In this paper, we study this heterogeneous task with the help of a few widely used MDS corpora and a suite of state-of-the-art models. We make an attempt to quantify the quality of summarization corpus and prescribe a list of points to consider while proposing a new MDS corpus. Next, we analyze the reason behind the absence of an MDS system which achieves superior performance across all corpora. We then observe the extent to which system metrics are influenced, and bias is propagated due to corpus properties. The scripts to reproduce the experiments in this work are available at https://github.com/LCS2-IIITD/summarization_bias.git.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
GenerationPrograms: Fine-grained Attribution with Executable Programs
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Estimating Optimal Context Length for Hybrid Retrieval-augmented Multi-document Summarization
Scaling Multi-Document Event Summarization: Evaluating Compression vs. Full-Text Approaches
Coverage-based Fairness in Multi-document Summarization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.