Analog vs. Digital Spatial Transforms: A Throughput, Power, and Area Comparison
원문 초록
Spatial linear transforms that process multiple parallel analog signals to simplify downstream signal processing find widespread use in multi-antenna communication systems, machine learning inference, data compression, audio and ultrasound applications, among many others. In the past, a wide range of mixed-signal as well as digital spatial transform circuits have been proposed---it is, however, a longstanding question whether analog or digital transforms are superior in terms of throughput, power, and area. In this paper, we focus on Hadamard transforms and perform a systematic comparison of state-of-the-art analog and digital circuits implementing spatial transforms in the same 65\,nm CMOS technology. We analyze the trade-offs between throughput, power, and area, and we identify regimes in which mixed-signal or digital Hadamard transforms are preferable. Our comparison reveals that (i) there is no clear winner and (ii) analog-to-digital conversion is often dominating area and energy efficiency---and not the spatial transform.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AstroCompress: A benchmark dataset for multi-purpose compression of astronomical data
Stationary MMD Points for Cubature
MiniLongBench: The Low-cost Long Context Understanding Benchmark for Large Language Models
Efficient compression of neural networks and datasets
DD-Ranking: Rethinking the Evaluation of Dataset Distillation
ReplayCAD: Generative Diffusion Replay for Continual Anomaly Detection
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.