Rethinking the Objectives of Extractive Question Answering
원문 초록
This work demonstrates that using the objective with independence assumption for modelling the span probability $P(a_s,a_e) = P(a_s)P(a_e)$ of span starting at position $a_s$ and ending at position $a_e$ has adverse effects. Therefore we propose multiple approaches to modelling joint probability $P(a_s,a_e)$ directly. Among those, we propose a compound objective, composed from the joint probability while still keeping the objective with independence assumption as an auxiliary objective. We find that the compound objective is consistently superior or equal to other assumptions in exact match. Additionally, we identified common errors caused by the assumption of independence and manually checked the counterpart predictions, demonstrating the impact of the compound objective on the real examples. Our findings are supported via experiments with three extractive QA models (BIDAF, BERT, ALBERT) over six datasets and our code, individual results and manual analysis are available online.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
L0: Reinforcement Learning to Become General Agents
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.