Accuracy and Performance Comparison of Video Action Recognition Approaches
원문 초록
Over the past few years, there has been significant interest in video action recognition systems and models. However, direct comparison of accuracy and computational performance results remain clouded by differing training environments, hardware specifications, hyperparameters, pipelines, and inference methods. This article provides a direct comparison between fourteen off-the-shelf and state-of-the-art models by ensuring consistency in these training characteristics in order to provide readers with a meaningful comparison across different types of video action recognition algorithms. Accuracy of the models is evaluated using standard Top-1 and Top-5 accuracy metrics in addition to a proposed new accuracy metric. Additionally, we compare computational performance of distributed training from two to sixty-four GPUs on a state-of-the-art HPC system.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Are Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolution Networks for Human Action Recognition Over-Parameterized?
Talk is Not Always Cheap: Promoting Wireless Sensing Models with Text Prompts
XRF V2: A Dataset for Action Summarization with Wi-Fi Signals, and IMUs in Phones, Watches, Earbuds, and Glasses
Visual WetlandBirds Dataset: Bird Species Identification and Behavior Recognition in Videos
OccludeNet: A Causal Journey into Mixed-View Actor-Centric Video Action Recognition under Occlusions
Efficient Transfer Learning for Video-language Foundation Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.