Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attacks
원문 초록
In a \emph{data poisoning attack}, an attacker modifies, deletes, and/or inserts some training examples to corrupt the learnt machine learning model. \emph{Bootstrap Aggregating (bagging)} is a well-known ensemble learning method, which trains multiple base models on random subsamples of a training dataset using a base learning algorithm and uses majority vote to predict labels of testing examples. We prove the intrinsic certified robustness of bagging against data poisoning attacks. Specifically, we show that bagging with an arbitrary base learning algorithm provably predicts the same label for a testing example when the number of modified, deleted, and/or inserted training examples is bounded by a threshold. Moreover, we show that our derived threshold is tight if no assumptions on the base learning algorithm are made. We evaluate our method on MNIST and CIFAR10. For instance, our method achieves a certified accuracy of $91.1\%$ on MNIST when arbitrarily modifying, deleting, and/or inserting 100 training examples. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/jjy1994/BaggingCertifyDataPoisoning}.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learning
ContextRefine-CLIP for EPIC-KITCHENS-100 Multi-Instance Retrieval Challenge 2025
VLMs Can Aggregate Scattered Training Patches
Bayesian Ensembling: Insights from Online Optimization and Empirical Bayes
iBitter-Stack: A Multi-Representation Ensemble Learning Model for Accurate Bitter Peptide Identification
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.