Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasets
원문 초록
Ideally Open-Domain Question Answering models should exhibit a number of competencies, ranging from simply memorizing questions seen at training time, to answering novel question formulations with answers seen during training, to generalizing to completely novel questions with novel answers. However, single aggregated test set scores do not show the full picture of what capabilities models truly have. In this work, we perform a detailed study of the test sets of three popular open-domain benchmark datasets with respect to these competencies. We find that 60-70% of test-time answers are also present somewhere in the training sets. We also find that 30% of test-set questions have a near-duplicate paraphrase in their corresponding training sets. Using these findings, we evaluate a variety of popular open-domain models to obtain greater insight into what extent they can actually generalize, and what drives their overall performance. We find that all models perform dramatically worse on questions that cannot be memorized from training sets, with a mean absolute performance difference of 63% between repeated and non-repeated data. Finally we show that simple nearest-neighbor models out-perform a BART closed-book QA model, further highlighting the role that training set memorization plays in these benchmarks
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TableRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Heterogeneous Document Reasoning
ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG
GenKI: Enhancing Open-Domain Question Answering with Knowledge Integration and Controllable Generation in Large Language Models
Efficient Context Selection for Long-Context QA: No Tuning, No Iteration, Just Adaptive-$k$
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.