General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Models
원문 초록
An increasing number of model-agnostic interpretation techniques for machine learning (ML) models such as partial dependence plots (PDP), permutation feature importance (PFI) and Shapley values provide insightful model interpretations, but can lead to wrong conclusions if applied incorrectly. We highlight many general pitfalls of ML model interpretation, such as using interpretation techniques in the wrong context, interpreting models that do not generalize well, ignoring feature dependencies, interactions, uncertainty estimates and issues in high-dimensional settings, or making unjustified causal interpretations, and illustrate them with examples. We focus on pitfalls for global methods that describe the average model behavior, but many pitfalls also apply to local methods that explain individual predictions. Our paper addresses ML practitioners by raising awareness of pitfalls and identifying solutions for correct model interpretation, but also addresses ML researchers by discussing open issues for further research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Explainable Debugger for Black-box Machine Learning Models
Enhancing interpretability of rule-based classifiers through feature graphs
Profiling Electric Vehicles via Early Charging Voltage Patterns
The Reader is the Metric: How Textual Features and Reader Profiles Explain Conflicting Evaluations of AI Creative Writing
Multi-criteria Rank-based Aggregation for Explainable AI
EPIC: Explanation of Pretrained Image Classification Networks via Prototype
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.