Algorithmic Decision Making with Conditional Fairness
원문 초록
Nowadays fairness issues have raised great concerns in decision-making systems. Various fairness notions have been proposed to measure the degree to which an algorithm is unfair. In practice, there frequently exist a certain set of variables we term as fair variables, which are pre-decision covariates such as users' choices. The effects of fair variables are irrelevant in assessing the fairness of the decision support algorithm. We thus define conditional fairness as a more sound fairness metric by conditioning on the fairness variables. Given different prior knowledge of fair variables, we demonstrate that traditional fairness notations, such as demographic parity and equalized odds, are special cases of our conditional fairness notations. Moreover, we propose a Derivable Conditional Fairness Regularizer (DCFR), which can be integrated into any decision-making model, to track the trade-off between precision and fairness of algorithmic decision making. Specifically, an adversarial representation based conditional independence loss is proposed in our DCFR to measure the degree of unfairness. With extensive experiments on three real-world datasets, we demonstrate the advantages of our conditional fairness notation and DCFR.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
One Size Fits None: Rethinking Fairness in Medical AI
Towards Responsible AI: Advances in Safety, Fairness, and Accountability of Autonomous Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.