Are Pretrained Language Models Symbolic Reasoners Over Knowledge?
원문 초록
How can pretrained language models (PLMs) learn factual knowledge from the training set? We investigate the two most important mechanisms: reasoning and memorization. Prior work has attempted to quantify the number of facts PLMs learn, but we present, using synthetic data, the first study that investigates the causal relation between facts present in training and facts learned by the PLM. For reasoning, we show that PLMs seem to learn to apply some symbolic reasoning rules correctly but struggle with others, including two-hop reasoning. Further analysis suggests that even the application of learned reasoning rules is flawed. For memorization, we identify schema conformity (facts systematically supported by other facts) and frequency as key factors for its success.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
Dataset distillation for memorized data: Soft labels can leak held-out teacher knowledge
LexiMark: Robust Watermarking via Lexical Substitutions to Enhance Membership Verification of an LLM's Textual Training Data
Capacity Matters: a Proof-of-Concept for Transformer Memorization on Real-World Data
Diffusion models under low-noise regime
HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.