Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via User Simulation
원문 초록
Conversational information access is an emerging research area. Currently, human evaluation is used for end-to-end system evaluation, which is both very time and resource intensive at scale, and thus becomes a bottleneck of progress. As an alternative, we propose automated evaluation by means of simulating users. Our user simulator aims to generate responses that a real human would give by considering both individual preferences and the general flow of interaction with the system. We evaluate our simulation approach on an item recommendation task by comparing three existing conversational recommender systems. We show that preference modeling and task-specific interaction models both contribute to more realistic simulations, and can help achieve high correlation between automatic evaluation measures and manual human assessments.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Thought-Augmented Planning for LLM-Powered Interactive Recommender Agent
The Future is Agentic: Definitions, Perspectives, and Open Challenges of Multi-Agent Recommender Systems
LLM-Based User Simulation for Low-Knowledge Shilling Attacks on Recommender Systems
Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Conversational Recommender Systems: A Simulation with Large Language Models
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
NLGCL: Naturally Existing Neighbor Layers Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.