What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Study
원문 초록
In recent years, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL) has been successfully applied to many different continuous control tasks. While RL algorithms are often conceptually simple, their state-of-the-art implementations take numerous low- and high-level design decisions that strongly affect the performance of the resulting agents. Those choices are usually not extensively discussed in the literature, leading to discrepancy between published descriptions of algorithms and their implementations. This makes it hard to attribute progress in RL and slows down overall progress [Engstrom'20]. As a step towards filling that gap, we implement >50 such ``choices'' in a unified on-policy RL framework, allowing us to investigate their impact in a large-scale empirical study. We train over 250'000 agents in five continuous control environments of different complexity and provide insights and practical recommendations for on-policy training of RL agents.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Sparse-Reg: Improving Sample Complexity in Offline Reinforcement Learning using Sparsity
DR-SAC: Distributionally Robust Soft Actor-Critic for Reinforcement Learning under Uncertainty
CO-PILOT: COllaborative Planning and reInforcement Learning On sub-Task curriculum
Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)
Scaling Algorithm Distillation for Continuous Control with Mamba
Self-Composing Policies for Scalable Continual Reinforcement Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.