Refining Implicit Argument Annotation for UCCA
원문 초록
Predicate-argument structure analysis is a central component in meaning representations of text. The fact that some arguments are not explicitly mentioned in a sentence gives rise to ambiguity in language understanding, and renders it difficult for machines to interpret text correctly. However, only few resources represent implicit roles for NLU, and existing studies in NLP only make coarse distinctions between categories of arguments omitted from linguistic form. This paper proposes a typology for fine-grained implicit argument annotation on top of Universal Conceptual Cognitive Annotation's foundational layer. The proposed implicit argument categorisation is driven by theories of implicit role interpretation and consists of six types: Deictic, Generic, Genre-based, Type-identifiable, Non-specific, and Iterated-set. We exemplify our design by revisiting part of the UCCA EWT corpus, providing a new dataset annotated with the refinement layer, and making a comparative analysis with other schemes.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Semantic similarity estimation for domain specific data using BERT and other techniques
skLEP: A Slovak General Language Understanding Benchmark
SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models
Neural at ArchEHR-QA 2025: Agentic Prompt Optimization for Evidence-Grounded Clinical Question Answering
MedPAIR: Measuring Physicians and AI Relevance Alignment in Medical Question Answering
StressTest: Can YOUR Speech LM Handle the Stress?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.