An Analysis of the Adaptation Speed of Causal Models
원문 초록
Consider a collection of datasets generated by unknown interventions on an unknown structural causal model $G$. Recently, Bengio et al. (2020) conjectured that among all candidate models, $G$ is the fastest to adapt from one dataset to another, along with promising experiments. Indeed, intuitively $G$ has less mechanisms to adapt, but this justification is incomplete. Our contribution is a more thorough analysis of this hypothesis. We investigate the adaptation speed of cause-effect SCMs. Using convergence rates from stochastic optimization, we justify that a relevant proxy for adaptation speed is distance in parameter space after intervention. Applying this proxy to categorical and normal cause-effect models, we show two results. When the intervention is on the cause variable, the SCM with the correct causal direction is advantaged by a large factor. When the intervention is on the effect variable, we characterize the relative adaptation speed. Surprisingly, we find situations where the anticausal model is advantaged, falsifying the initial hypothesis. Code to reproduce experiments is available at https://github.com/remilepriol/causal-adaptation-speed
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Geo-ORBIT: A Federated Digital Twin Framework for Scene-Adaptive Lane Geometry Detection
DIP: Unsupervised Dense In-Context Post-training of Visual Representations
Episode-specific Fine-tuning for Metric-based Few-shot Learners with Optimization-based Training
Meta-learning how to Share Credit among Macro-Actions
Latent Representation Learning of Multi-scale Thermophysics: Application to Dynamics in Shocked Porous Energetic Material
Robust LLM Unlearning with MUDMAN: Meta-Unlearning with Disruption Masking And Normalization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.