Sparse Methods for Automatic Relevance Determination
원문 초록
This work considers methods for imposing sparsity in Bayesian regression with applications in nonlinear system identification. We first review automatic relevance determination (ARD) and analytically demonstrate the need to additional regularization or thresholding to achieve sparse models. We then discuss two classes of methods, regularization based and thresholding based, which build on ARD to learn parsimonious solutions to linear problems. In the case of orthogonal covariates, we analytically demonstrate favorable performance with regards to learning a small set of active terms in a linear system with a sparse solution. Several example problems are presented to compare the set of proposed methods in terms of advantages and limitations to ARD in bases with hundreds of elements. The aim of this paper is to analyze and understand the assumptions that lead to several algorithms and to provide theoretical and empirical results so that the reader may gain insight and make more informed choices regarding sparse Bayesian regression.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Near-Polynomially Competitive Active Logistic Regression
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Vector Contrastive Learning For Pixel-Wise Pretraining In Medical Vision
GRASP: Grouped Regression with Adaptive Shrinkage Priors
CAWR: Corruption-Averse Advantage-Weighted Regression for Robust Policy Optimization
Scaling-Up the Pretraining of the Earth Observation Foundation Model PhilEO to the MajorTOM Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.