Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?
원문 초록
We compare classification and regression tasks in an overparameterized linear model with Gaussian features. On the one hand, we show that with sufficient overparameterization all training points are support vectors: solutions obtained by least-squares minimum-norm interpolation, typically used for regression, are identical to those produced by the hard-margin support vector machine (SVM) that minimizes the hinge loss, typically used for training classifiers. On the other hand, we show that there exist regimes where these interpolating solutions generalize well when evaluated by the 0-1 test loss function, but do not generalize if evaluated by the square loss function, i.e. they approach the null risk. Our results demonstrate the very different roles and properties of loss functions used at the training phase (optimization) and the testing phase (generalization).
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Vector Contrastive Learning For Pixel-Wise Pretraining In Medical Vision
GRASP: Grouped Regression with Adaptive Shrinkage Priors
CAWR: Corruption-Averse Advantage-Weighted Regression for Robust Policy Optimization
Scaling-Up the Pretraining of the Earth Observation Foundation Model PhilEO to the MajorTOM Dataset
Fidelity Isn't Accuracy: When Linearly Decodable Functions Fail to Match the Ground Truth
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.