History for Visual Dialog: Do we really need it?
원문 초록
Visual Dialog involves "understanding" the dialog history (what has been discussed previously) and the current question (what is asked), in addition to grounding information in the image, to generate the correct response. In this paper, we show that co-attention models which explicitly encode dialog history outperform models that don't, achieving state-of-the-art performance (72 % NDCG on val set). However, we also expose shortcomings of the crowd-sourcing dataset collection procedure by showing that history is indeed only required for a small amount of the data and that the current evaluation metric encourages generic replies. To that end, we propose a challenging subset (VisDialConv) of the VisDial val set and provide a benchmark of 63% NDCG.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Hawk: Learning to Understand Open-World Video Anomalies
Mini-Gemini: Mining the Potential of Multi-modality Vision Language Models
Collecting Visually-Grounded Dialogue with A Game Of Sorts
PaCE: Unified Multi-modal Dialogue Pre-training with Progressive and Compositional Experts
Unified Multimodal Model with Unlikelihood Training for Visual Dialog
LAVIS: A Library for Language-Vision Intelligence
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.