Think Too Fast Nor Too Slow: The Computational Trade-off Between Planning And Reinforcement Learning
원문 초록
Planning and reinforcement learning are two key approaches to sequential decision making. Multi-step approximate real-time dynamic programming, a recently successful algorithm class of which AlphaZero [Silver et al., 2018] is an example, combines both by nesting planning within a learning loop. However, the combination of planning and learning introduces a new question: how should we balance time spend on planning, learning and acting? The importance of this trade-off has not been explicitly studied before. We show that it is actually of key importance, with computational results indicating that we should neither plan too long nor too short. Conceptually, we identify a new spectrum of planning-learning algorithms which ranges from exhaustive search (long planning) to model-free RL (no planning), with optimal performance achieved midway.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learning
Flow-Based Single-Step Completion for Efficient and Expressive Policy Learning
Actor-Critic Deep Reinforcement Learning for Solving Job Shop Scheduling Problems
Constructing Non-Markovian Decision Process via History Aggregator
UProp: Investigating the Uncertainty Propagation of LLMs in Multi-Step Agentic Decision-Making
Adaptive Action Duration with Contextual Bandits for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Dynamic Environments
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.