arXiv:2004.02671
On Evaluating the Quality of Rule-Based Classification Systems
원문 초록
Two indicators are classically used to evaluate the quality of rule-based classification systems: predictive accuracy, i.e. the system's ability to successfully reproduce learning data and coverage, i.e. the proportion of possible cases for which the logical rules constituting the system apply. In this work, we claim that these two indicators may be insufficient, and additional measures of quality may need to be developed. We theoretically show that classification systems presenting "good" predictive accuracy and coverage can, nonetheless, be trivially improved and illustrate this proposition with examples.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Generative Adversarial Minority Oversampling for Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification
Attention-Based Adaptive Spectral-Spatial Kernel ResNet for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Image and Text fusion for UPMC Food-101 \\using BERT and CNNs
Kidney Level Lupus Nephritis Classification using Uncertainty Guided Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks
Beyond the Attention: Distinguish the Discriminative and Confusable Features For Fine-grained Image Classification
Orthrus: A Bimodal Learning Architecture for Malware Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.