At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarization
원문 초록
Extractive methods have been proven effective in automatic document summarization. Previous works perform this task by identifying informative contents at sentence level. However, it is unclear whether performing extraction at sentence level is the best solution. In this work, we show that unnecessity and redundancy issues exist when extracting full sentences, and extracting sub-sentential units is a promising alternative. Specifically, we propose extracting sub-sentential units based on the constituency parsing tree. A neural extractive model which leverages the sub-sentential information and extracts them is presented. Extensive experiments and analyses show that extracting sub-sentential units performs competitively comparing to full sentence extraction under the evaluation of both automatic and human evaluations. Hopefully, our work could provide some inspiration of the basic extraction units in extractive summarization for future research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
GoSum: Extractive Summarization of Long Documents by Reinforcement Learning and Graph Organized discourse state
Sparse Optimization for Unsupervised Extractive Summarization of Long Documents with the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm
A Novel Word Pair-based Gaussian Sentence Similarity Algorithm For Bengali Extractive Text Summarization
Fair Summarization: Bridging Quality and Diversity in Extractive Summaries
Hierarchical Attention Graph for Scientific Document Summarization in Global and Local Level
OARelatedWork: A Large-Scale Dataset of Related Work Sections with Full-texts from Open Access Sources
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.