FastDTW is approximate and Generally Slower than the Algorithm it Approximates
원문 초록
Many time series data mining problems can be solved with repeated use of distance measure. Examples of such tasks include similarity search, clustering, classification, anomaly detection and segmentation. For over two decades it has been known that the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance measure is the best measure to use for most tasks, in most domains. Because the classic DTW algorithm has quadratic time complexity, many ideas have been introduced to reduce its amortized time, or to quickly approximate it. One of the most cited approximate approaches is FastDTW. The FastDTW algorithm has well over a thousand citations and has been explicitly used in several hundred research efforts. In this work, we make a surprising claim. In any realistic data mining application, the approximate FastDTW is much slower than the exact DTW. This fact clearly has implications for the community that uses this algorithm: allowing it to address much larger datasets, get exact results, and do so in less time.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Process mining-driven modeling and simulation to enhance fault diagnosis in cyber-physical systems
Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Feature Analysis Based on Time Series for Surveillance Video
DATE: Dual Attentive Tree-aware Embedding for Customs Fraud Detection
DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Energy Time Series Data Using Variational Recurrent Autoencoders with Attention
Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.