SAM: The Sensitivity of Attribution Methods to Hyperparameters
원문 초록
Attribution methods can provide powerful insights into the reasons for a classifier's decision. We argue that a key desideratum of an explanation method is its robustness to input hyperparameters which are often randomly set or empirically tuned. High sensitivity to arbitrary hyperparameter choices does not only impede reproducibility but also questions the correctness of an explanation and impairs the trust of end-users. In this paper, we provide a thorough empirical study on the sensitivity of existing attribution methods. We found an alarming trend that many methods are highly sensitive to changes in their common hyperparameters e.g. even changing a random seed can yield a different explanation! Interestingly, such sensitivity is not reflected in the average explanation accuracy scores over the dataset as commonly reported in the literature. In addition, explanations generated for robust classifiers (i.e. which are trained to be invariant to pixel-wise perturbations) are surprisingly more robust than those generated for regular classifiers.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Generative Latent Kernel Modeling for Blind Motion Deblurring
Differentially Private Relational Learning with Entity-level Privacy Guarantees
EtiCor++: Towards Understanding Etiquettical Bias in LLMs
Fragility in Average Treatment Effect on the Treated under Limited Covariate Support
Assessing parameter identifiability of a hemodynamics PDE model using spectral surrogates and dimension reduction
ACCESS DENIED INC: The First Benchmark Environment for Sensitivity Awareness
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.