Is There Tradeoff between Spatial and Temporal in Video Super-Resolution?
원문 초록
Recent advances of deep learning lead to great success of image and video super-resolution (SR) methods that are based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). For video SR, advanced algorithms have been proposed to exploit the temporal correlation between low-resolution (LR) video frames, and/or to super-resolve a frame with multiple LR frames. These methods pursue higher quality of super-resolved frames, where the quality is usually measured frame by frame in e.g. PSNR. However, frame-wise quality may not reveal the consistency between frames. If an algorithm is applied to each frame independently (which is the case of most previous methods), the algorithm may cause temporal inconsistency, which can be observed as flickering. It is a natural requirement to improve both frame-wise fidelity and between-frame consistency, which are termed spatial quality and temporal quality, respectively. Then we may ask, is a method optimized for spatial quality also optimized for temporal quality? Can we optimize the two quality metrics jointly?
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ICME 2025 Grand Challenge on Video Super-Resolution for Video Conferencing
A Systematic Investigation on Deep Learning-Based Omnidirectional Image and Video Super-Resolution
DOVE: Efficient One-Step Diffusion Model for Real-World Video Super-Resolution
EvEnhancer: Empowering Effectiveness, Efficiency and Generalizability for Continuous Space-Time Video Super-Resolution with Events
Small Clips, Big Gains: Learning Long-Range Refocused Temporal Information for Video Super-Resolution
Event-Enhanced Blurry Video Super-Resolution
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.