Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruning
원문 초록
Many neural network pruning algorithms proceed in three steps: train the network to completion, remove unwanted structure to compress the network, and retrain the remaining structure to recover lost accuracy. The standard retraining technique, fine-tuning, trains the unpruned weights from their final trained values using a small fixed learning rate. In this paper, we compare fine-tuning to alternative retraining techniques. Weight rewinding (as proposed by Frankle et al., (2019)), rewinds unpruned weights to their values from earlier in training and retrains them from there using the original training schedule. Learning rate rewinding (which we propose) trains the unpruned weights from their final values using the same learning rate schedule as weight rewinding. Both rewinding techniques outperform fine-tuning, forming the basis of a network-agnostic pruning algorithm that matches the accuracy and compression ratios of several more network-specific state-of-the-art techniques.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Hierarchical Safety Realignment: Lightweight Restoration of Safety in Pruned Large Vision-Language Models
Adaptive Pruning of Deep Neural Networks for Resource-Aware Embedded Intrusion Detection on the Edge
Guiding Evolutionary AutoEncoder Training with Activation-Based Pruning Operators
ReplaceMe: Network Simplification via Layer Pruning and Linear Transformations
Boosting Large Language Models with Mask Fine-Tuning
Compact Bayesian Neural Networks via pruned MCMC sampling
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.