Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracy
원문 초록
Adversarial training augments the training set with perturbations to improve the robust error (over worst-case perturbations), but it often leads to an increase in the standard error (on unperturbed test inputs). Previous explanations for this tradeoff rely on the assumption that no predictor in the hypothesis class has low standard and robust error. In this work, we precisely characterize the effect of augmentation on the standard error in linear regression when the optimal linear predictor has zero standard and robust error. In particular, we show that the standard error could increase even when the augmented perturbations have noiseless observations from the optimal linear predictor. We then prove that the recently proposed robust self-training (RST) estimator improves robust error without sacrificing standard error for noiseless linear regression. Empirically, for neural networks, we find that RST with different adversarial training methods improves both standard and robust error for random and adversarial rotations and adversarial $\ell_\infty$ perturbations in CIFAR-10.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Near-Polynomially Competitive Active Logistic Regression
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Vector Contrastive Learning For Pixel-Wise Pretraining In Medical Vision
GRASP: Grouped Regression with Adaptive Shrinkage Priors
CAWR: Corruption-Averse Advantage-Weighted Regression for Robust Policy Optimization
Scaling-Up the Pretraining of the Earth Observation Foundation Model PhilEO to the MajorTOM Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.