Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models
원문 초록
Devising indicative evaluation metrics for the image generation task remains an open problem. The most widely used metric for measuring the similarity between real and generated images has been the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) score. Because it does not differentiate the fidelity and diversity aspects of the generated images, recent papers have introduced variants of precision and recall metrics to diagnose those properties separately. In this paper, we show that even the latest version of the precision and recall metrics are not reliable yet. For example, they fail to detect the match between two identical distributions, they are not robust against outliers, and the evaluation hyperparameters are selected arbitrarily. We propose density and coverage metrics that solve the above issues. We analytically and experimentally show that density and coverage provide more interpretable and reliable signals for practitioners than the existing metrics. Code: https://github.com/clovaai/generative-evaluation-prdc.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Synthesizing Reality: Leveraging the Generative AI-Powered Platform Midjourney for Construction Worker Detection
AdaptaGen: Domain-Specific Image Generation through Hierarchical Semantic Optimization Framework
Beyond Blur: A Fluid Perspective on Generative Diffusion Models
AI's Blind Spots: Geographic Knowledge and Diversity Deficit in Generated Urban Scenario
SPARKE: Scalable Prompt-Aware Diversity Guidance in Diffusion Models via RKE Score
Noise Consistency Regularization for Improved Subject-Driven Image Synthesis
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.