No-Regret and Incentive-Compatible Online Learning
원문 초록
We study online learning settings in which experts act strategically to maximize their influence on the learning algorithm's predictions by potentially misreporting their beliefs about a sequence of binary events. Our goal is twofold. First, we want the learning algorithm to be no-regret with respect to the best fixed expert in hindsight. Second, we want incentive compatibility, a guarantee that each expert's best strategy is to report his true beliefs about the realization of each event. To achieve this goal, we build on the literature on wagering mechanisms, a type of multi-agent scoring rule. We provide algorithms that achieve no regret and incentive compatibility for myopic experts for both the full and partial information settings. In experiments on datasets from FiveThirtyEight, our algorithms have regret comparable to classic no-regret algorithms, which are not incentive-compatible. Finally, we identify an incentive-compatible algorithm for forward-looking strategic agents that exhibits diminishing regret in practice.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objective
Enforcing tail calibration when training probabilistic forecast models
Harnessing Superclasses for Learning from Hierarchical Databases
Bayesian Autoregressive Online Change-Point Detection with Time-Varying Parameters
Improving probabilistic forecasts of extreme wind speeds by training statistical post-processing models with weighted scoring rules
Distributional Regression U-Nets for the Postprocessing of Precipitation Ensemble Forecasts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.