Verifying Tree Ensembles by Reasoning about Potential Instances
원문 초록
Imagine being able to ask questions to a black box model such as "Which adversarial examples exist?", "Does a specific attribute have a disproportionate effect on the model's prediction?" or "What kind of predictions could possibly be made for a partially described example?" This last question is particularly important if your partial description does not correspond to any observed example in your data, as it provides insight into how the model will extrapolate to unseen data. These capabilities would be extremely helpful as they would allow a user to better understand the model's behavior, particularly as it relates to issues such as robustness, fairness, and bias. In this paper, we propose such an approach for an ensemble of trees. Since, in general, this task is intractable we present a strategy that (1) can prune part of the input space given the question asked to simplify the problem; and (2) follows a divide and conquer approach that is incremental and can always return some answers and indicates which parts of the input domains are still uncertain. The usefulness of our approach is shown on a diverse set of use cases.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Robustly Improving LLM Fairness in Realistic Settings via Interpretability
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
IndianBailJudgments-1200: A Multi-Attribute Dataset for Legal NLP on Indian Bail Orders
FeDa4Fair: Client-Level Federated Datasets for Fairness Evaluation
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
Compositional Attribute Imbalance in Vision Datasets
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.