Understanding the Power of Persistence Pairing via Permutation Test
원문 초록
Recently many efforts have been made to incorporate persistence diagrams, one of the major tools in topological data analysis (TDA), into machine learning pipelines. To better understand the power and limitation of persistence diagrams, we carry out a range of experiments on both graph data and shape data, aiming to decouple and inspect the effects of different factors involved. To this end, we also propose the so-called \emph{permutation test} for persistence diagrams to delineate critical values and pairings of critical values. For graph classification tasks, we note that while persistence pairing yields consistent improvement over various benchmark datasets, it appears that for various filtration functions tested, most discriminative power comes from critical values. For shape segmentation and classification, however, we note that persistence pairing shows significant power on most of the benchmark datasets, and improves over both summaries based on merely critical values, and those based on permutation tests. Our results help provide insights on when persistence diagram based summaries could be more suitable.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CliquePH: Higher-Order Information for Graph Neural Networks through Persistent Homology on Clique Graphs
Dynamic Neural Dowker Network: Approximating Persistent Homology in Dynamic Directed Graphs
GEFL: Extended Filtration Learning for Graph Classification
Density-aware Walks for Coordinated Campaign Detection
Positional Encoding meets Persistent Homology on Graphs
Improving the Effective Receptive Field of Message-Passing Neural Networks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.