Measuring Non-Expert Comprehension of Machine Learning Fairness Metrics
원문 초록
Bias in machine learning has manifested injustice in several areas, such as medicine, hiring, and criminal justice. In response, computer scientists have developed myriad definitions of fairness to correct this bias in fielded algorithms. While some definitions are based on established legal and ethical norms, others are largely mathematical. It is unclear whether the general public agrees with these fairness definitions, and perhaps more importantly, whether they understand these definitions. We take initial steps toward bridging this gap between ML researchers and the public, by addressing the question: does a lay audience understand a basic definition of ML fairness? We develop a metric to measure comprehension of three such definitions--demographic parity, equal opportunity, and equalized odds. We evaluate this metric using an online survey, and investigate the relationship between comprehension and sentiment, demographics, and the definition itself.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Repurposing recidivism models for forecasting police officer use of force
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tone
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Fairness Is Not Enough: Auditing Competence and Intersectional Bias in AI-powered Resume Screening
Datasets for Fairness in Language Models: An In-Depth Survey
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.