AutoML: Exploration v.s. Exploitation
원문 초록
Building a machine learning (ML) pipeline in an automated way is a crucial and complex task as it is constrained with the available time budget and resources. This encouraged the research community to introduce several solutions to utilize the available time and resources. A lot of work is done to suggest the most promising classifiers for a given dataset using sundry of techniques including meta-learning based techniques. This gives the autoML framework the chance to spend more time exploiting those classifiers and tuning their hyper-parameters. In this paper, we empirically study the hypothesis of improving the pipeline performance by exploiting the most promising classifiers within the limited time budget. We also study the effect of increasing the time budget over the pipeline performance. The empirical results across autoSKLearn, TPOT and ATM, show that exploiting the most promising classifiers does not achieve a statistically better performance than exploring the entire search space. The same conclusion is also applied for long time budgets.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AutoML for Multi-Class Anomaly Compensation of Sensor Drift
Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation
An experimental survey and Perspective View on Meta-Learning for Automated Algorithms Selection and Parametrization
Online Meta-learning for AutoML in Real-time (OnMAR)
Geo-ORBIT: A Federated Digital Twin Framework for Scene-Adaptive Lane Geometry Detection
Overtuning in Hyperparameter Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.