Empirical Comparisons of CNN with Other Learning Algorithms for Text Classification in Legal Document Review
원문 초록
Research has shown that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) can be effectively applied to text classification as part of a predictive coding protocol. That said, most research to date has been conducted on data sets with short documents that do not reflect the variety of documents in real world document reviews. Using data from four actual reviews with documents of varying lengths, we compared CNN with other popular machine learning algorithms for text classification, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest. For each data set, classification models were trained with different training sample sizes using different learning algorithms. These models were then evaluated using a large randomly sampled test set of documents, and the results were compared using precision and recall curves. Our study demonstrates that CNN performed well, but that there was no single algorithm that performed the best across the combination of data sets and training sample sizes. These results will help advance research into the legal profession's use of machine learning algorithms that maximize performance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TokenBreak: Bypassing Text Classification Models Through Token Manipulation
Incremental Sequence Classification with Temporal Consistency
Small Language Models in the Real World: Insights from Industrial Text Classification
Token Masking Improves Transformer-Based Text Classification
KDH-MLTC: Knowledge Distillation for Healthcare Multi-Label Text Classification
ICS: Total Freedom in Manual Text Classification Supported by Unobtrusive Machine Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.