Regularization Shortcomings for Continual Learning
원문 초록
In most machine learning algorithms, training data is assumed to be independent and identically distributed (iid). When it is not the case, the algorithm's performances are challenged, leading to the famous phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting. Algorithms dealing with it are gathered in the Continual Learning research field. In this paper, we study the regularization based approaches to continual learning and show that those approaches can not learn to discriminate classes from different tasks in an elemental continual benchmark: the class-incremental scenario. We make theoretical reasoning to prove this shortcoming and illustrate it with examples and experiments. Moreover, we show that it can have some important consequences on continual multi-tasks reinforcement learning or in pre-trained models used for continual learning. We believe that highlighting and understanding the shortcomings of regularization strategies will help us to use them more efficiently.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SEE: Continual Fine-tuning with Sequential Ensemble of Experts
Energy Weighted Learning Progress Guided Interleaved Multi-Task Learning
EXTENDING CONDITIONAL CONVOLUTION STRUCTURES FOR ENHANCING MULTITASKING CONTINUAL LEARNING
Questioning Representational Optimism in Deep Learning: The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis
Robust-Multi-Task Gradient Boosting
LifelongPR: Lifelong knowledge fusion for point cloud place recognition based on replay and prompt learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.