Optimizing the Factual Correctness of a Summary: A Study of Summarizing Radiology Reports
원문 초록
Neural abstractive summarization models are able to generate summaries which have high overlap with human references. However, existing models are not optimized for factual correctness, a critical metric in real-world applications. In this work, we develop a general framework where we evaluate the factual correctness of a generated summary by fact-checking it automatically against its reference using an information extraction module. We further propose a training strategy which optimizes a neural summarization model with a factual correctness reward via reinforcement learning. We apply the proposed method to the summarization of radiology reports, where factual correctness is a key requirement. On two separate datasets collected from hospitals, we show via both automatic and human evaluation that the proposed approach substantially improves the factual correctness and overall quality of outputs over a competitive neural summarization system, producing radiology summaries that approach the quality of human-authored ones.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Exploring the robustness of TractOracle methods in RL-based tractography
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Gradient Eligibility Traces
AutoTriton: Automatic Triton Programming with Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
Generalized Adaptive Transfer Network: Enhancing Transfer Learning in Reinforcement Learning Across Domains
OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.