Why can't memory networks read effectively?
원문 초록
Memory networks have been a popular choice among neural architectures for machine reading comprehension and question answering. While recent work revealed that memory networks can't truly perform multi-hop reasoning, we show in the present paper that vanilla memory networks are ineffective even in single-hop reading comprehension. We analyze the reasons for this on two cloze-style datasets, one from the medical domain and another including children's fiction. We find that the output classification layer with entity-specific weights, and the aggregation of passage information with relatively flat attention distributions are the most important contributors to poor results. We propose network adaptations that can serve as simple remedies. We also find that the presence of unseen answers at test time can dramatically affect the reported results, so we suggest controlling for this factor during evaluation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models
LogiQA 2.0—An Improved Dataset for Logical Reasoning in Natural Language Understanding
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
DeRIS: Decoupling Perception and Cognition for Enhanced Referring Image Segmentation through Loopback Synergy
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.