Extraction of Complex DNN Models: Real Threat or Boogeyman?
원문 초록
Recently, machine learning (ML) has introduced advanced solutions to many domains. Since ML models provide business advantage to model owners, protecting intellectual property of ML models has emerged as an important consideration. Confidentiality of ML models can be protected by exposing them to clients only via prediction APIs. However, model extraction attacks can steal the functionality of ML models using the information leaked to clients through the results returned via the API. In this work, we question whether model extraction is a serious threat to complex, real-life ML models. We evaluate the current state-of-the-art model extraction attack (Knockoff nets) against complex models. We reproduce and confirm the results in the original paper. But we also show that the performance of this attack can be limited by several factors, including ML model architecture and the granularity of API response. Furthermore, we introduce a defense based on distinguishing queries used for Knockoff nets from benign queries. Despite the limitations of the Knockoff nets, we show that a more realistic adversary can effectively steal complex ML models and evade known defenses.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CEGA: A Cost-Effective Approach for Graph-Based Model Extraction and Acquisition
MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models
ATOM: A Framework of Detecting Query-Based Model Extraction Attacks for Graph Neural Networks
From Counterfactuals to Trees: Competitive Analysis of Model Extraction Attacks
Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety
Neural Honeytrace: A Robust Plug-and-Play Watermarking Framework against Model Extraction Attacks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.