R4C: A Benchmark for Evaluating RC Systems to Get the Right Answer for the Right Reason
원문 초록
Recent studies have revealed that reading comprehension (RC) systems learn to exploit annotation artifacts and other biases in current datasets. This prevents the community from reliably measuring the progress of RC systems. To address this issue, we introduce R4C, a new task for evaluating RC systems' internal reasoning. R4C requires giving not only answers but also derivations: explanations that justify predicted answers. We present a reliable, crowdsourced framework for scalably annotating RC datasets with derivations. We create and publicly release the R4C dataset, the first, quality-assured dataset consisting of 4.6k questions, each of which is annotated with 3 reference derivations (i.e. 13.8k derivations). Experiments show that our automatic evaluation metrics using multiple reference derivations are reliable, and that R4C assesses different skills from an existing benchmark.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DeRIS: Decoupling Perception and Cognition for Enhanced Referring Image Segmentation through Loopback Synergy
Chaining Event Spans for Temporal Relation Grounding
CoMuMDR: Code-mixed Multi-modal Multi-domain corpus for Discourse paRsing in conversations
Automatic Generation of Inference Making Questions for Reading Comprehension Assessments
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models
ReadBench: Measuring the Dense Text Visual Reading Ability of Vision-Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.