Towards a Metric for Automated Conversational Dialogue System Evaluation and Improvement
원문 초록
We present "AutoJudge", an automated evaluation method for conversational dialogue systems. The method works by first generating dialogues based on self-talk, i.e. dialogue systems talking to itself. Then, it uses human ratings on these dialogues to train an automated judgement model. Our experiments show that AutoJudge correlates well with the human ratings and can be used to automatically evaluate dialogue systems, even in deployed systems. In a second part, we attempt to apply AutoJudge to improve existing systems. This works well for re-ranking a set of candidate utterances. However, our experiments show that AutoJudge cannot be applied as reward for reinforcement learning, although the metric can distinguish good from bad dialogues. We discuss potential reasons, but state here already that this is still an open question for further research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Exploring the robustness of TractOracle methods in RL-based tractography
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Gradient Eligibility Traces
AutoTriton: Automatic Triton Programming with Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
Generalized Adaptive Transfer Network: Enhancing Transfer Learning in Reinforcement Learning Across Domains
OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.