Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?
원문 초록
Recent years have seen a dramatic expansion of tasks and datasets posed as question answering, from reading comprehension, semantic role labeling, and even machine translation, to image and video understanding. With this expansion, there are many differing views on the utility and definition of "question answering" itself. Some argue that its scope should be narrow, or broad, or that it is overused in datasets today. In this opinion piece, we argue that question answering should be considered a format which is sometimes useful for studying particular phenomena, not a phenomenon or task in itself. We discuss when a task is correctly described as question answering, and when a task is usefully posed as question answering, instead of using some other format.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
TACTIC: Translation Agents with Cognitive-Theoretic Interactive Collaboration
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models
Translate With Care: Addressing Gender Bias, Neutrality, and Reasoning in Large Language Model Translations
Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine Translation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.