Google vs IBM: A Constraint Solving Challenge on the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem
원문 초록
The job-shop scheduling is one of the most studied optimization problems from the dawn of computer era to the present day. Its combinatorial nature makes it easily expressible as a constraint satisfaction problem. In this paper, we compare the performance of two constraint solvers on the job-shop scheduling problem. The solvers in question are: OR-Tools, an open-source solver developed by Google and winner of the last MiniZinc Challenge, and CP Optimizer, a proprietary IBM constraint solver targeted at industrial scheduling problems. The comparison is based on the goodness of the solutions found and the time required to solve the problem instances. First, we target the classic benchmarks from the literature, then we carry out the comparison on a benchmark that was created with known optimal solution, with size comparable to real-world industrial problems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Production Scheduling Framework for Reinforcement Learning Under Real-World Constraints
Solving the Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Graph Neural Networks: A Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environment
Unraveling the Rainbow: can value-based methods schedule?
REMoH: A Reflective Evolution of Multi-objective Heuristics approach via Large Language Models
ALAS: A Stateful Multi-LLM Agent Framework for Disruption-Aware Planning
Adaptive Bias Generalized Rollout Policy Adaptation on the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.