Comparison of UNet, ENet, and BoxENet for Segmentation of Mast Cells in Scans of Histological Slices
원문 초록
Deep neural networks show high accuracy in theproblem of semantic and instance segmentation of biomedicaldata. However, this approach is computationally expensive. Thecomputational cost may be reduced with network simplificationafter training or choosing the proper architecture, which providessegmentation with less accuracy but does it much faster. In thepresent study, we analyzed the accuracy and performance ofUNet and ENet architectures for the problem of semantic imagesegmentation. In addition, we investigated the ENet architecture by replacing of some convolution layers with box-convolutionlayers. The analysis performed on the original dataset consisted of histology slices with mast cells. These cells provide a region forsegmentation with different types of borders, which vary fromclearly visible to ragged. ENet was less accurate than UNet byonly about 1-2%, but ENet performance was 8-15 times faster than UNet one.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
No time to train! Training-Free Reference-Based Instance Segmentation
NOCTIS: Novel Object Cyclic Threshold based Instance Segmentation
Prohibited Items Segmentation via Occlusion-aware Bilayer Modeling
The Four Color Theorem for Cell Instance Segmentation
OpenMaskDINO3D : Reasoning 3D Segmentation via Large Language Model
SCORE: Scene Context Matters in Open-Vocabulary Remote Sensing Instance Segmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.