Neural data-to-text generation: A comparison between pipeline and end-to-end architectures
원문 초록
Traditionally, most data-to-text applications have been designed using a modular pipeline architecture, in which non-linguistic input data is converted into natural language through several intermediate transformations. In contrast, recent neural models for data-to-text generation have been proposed as end-to-end approaches, where the non-linguistic input is rendered in natural language with much less explicit intermediate representations in-between. This study introduces a systematic comparison between neural pipeline and end-to-end data-to-text approaches for the generation of text from RDF triples. Both architectures were implemented making use of state-of-the art deep learning methods as the encoder-decoder Gated-Recurrent Units (GRU) and Transformer. Automatic and human evaluations together with a qualitative analysis suggest that having explicit intermediate steps in the generation process results in better texts than the ones generated by end-to-end approaches. Moreover, the pipeline models generalize better to unseen inputs. Data and code are publicly available.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Seq vs Seq: An Open Suite of Paired Encoders and Decoders
Muddit: Liberating Generation Beyond Text-to-Image with a Unified Discrete Diffusion Model
Controlling Summarization Length Through EOS Token Weighting
GEM: Empowering LLM for both Embedding Generation and Language Understanding
EEG2TEXT-CN: An Exploratory Study of Open-Vocabulary Chinese Text-EEG Alignment via Large Language Model and Contrastive Learning on ChineseEEG
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.