The efficacy of various machine learning models for multi-class classification of RNA-seq expression data
원문 초록
Late diagnosis and high costs are key factors that negatively impact the care of cancer patients worldwide. Although the availability of biological markers for the diagnosis of cancer type is increasing, costs and reliability of tests currently present a barrier to the adoption of their routine use. There is a pressing need for accurate methods that enable early diagnosis and cover a broad range of cancers. The use of machine learning and RNA-seq expression analysis has shown promise in the classification of cancer type. However, research is inconclusive about which type of machine learning models are optimal. The suitability of five algorithms were assessed for the classification of 17 different cancer types. Each algorithm was fine-tuned and trained on the full array of 18,015 genes per sample, for 4,221 samples (75 % of the dataset). They were then tested with 1,408 samples (25 % of the dataset) for which cancer types were withheld to determine the accuracy of prediction. The results show that ensemble algorithms achieve 100% accuracy in the classification of 14 out of 17 types of cancer. The clustering and classification models, while faster than the ensembles, performed poorly due to the high level of noise in the dataset. When the features were reduced to a list of 20 genes, the ensemble algorithms maintained an accuracy above 95% as opposed to the clustering and classification models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ExploreKit: Automatic Feature Generation and Selection
Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques
Detecting immune cells with label-free two-photon autofluorescence and deep learning
Analysis of Kepler Objects of Interest using Machine Learning for Exoplanet Identification
Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Generative Adversarial Minority Oversampling for Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.